Ordinance to Crack Down on Fake Military Approved
The Walnut City Council Wednesday night voted 3-2 in favor of the ordinance that prohibits people from wearing unauthorized U.S. military uniforms and insignias.
The city of Walnut has a new ordinance on the books that prohibits the wearing of a U.S. military uniform or insignia by those not authorized to do so.
The City Council Wednesday night voted 3-2 to approve the ordinance. Councilmen Joaquin Lim and Antonio “Tony” Cartagena voted against the measure. The council initially deadlocked in a 2-2 vote, with Councilman Tom King and Mayor Pro Tem Mary Su voting for the ordinance and Mayor Nancy Tragarz abstaining.
However, the measure passed on a second vote after the council agreed to reduce it to an infraction from a misdemeanor at the mayor’s suggestion. An infraction would result in a warning for the first offense followed by a fine on a subsequent violation, according to the city.
Cartagena said he did not vote in favor of the ordinance because he prefers that violators be cited based on the existing federal law that the city’s ordinance is mimicking.
Lim, a veteran, said he didn’t see the need for a local ordinance with similar state and federal laws in place.
“Why do we as a city have to pass an additional ordinance when there’s no value added,” he said, adding that he could not find another city with a similar law.
King, also a veteran, proposed the ordinance in response to reading stories about fake military groups and seeing some members of these civilian organizations at events wearing medals he was sure they did not earn.
He said when he sees someone wearing a military uniform and medals they are not authorized to don, he gets a sick feeling.
“I am very, very concerned that people are joining these organizations and walking around in uniforms they didn’t earn,” he said. “I’m not trying to play federal ruler. This ordinance just says we’re going to follow the federal law.”
The ordinance was approved on a first reading in December, but when it returned for a second and final reading earlier this month, members of a group called the United States Volunteers-Joint Services Command objected to the measure. The group, which dons military uniforms when conducting funerals of service members, asked that it be postponed until they could meet with council members and share their concerns.
Several members from the group spoke against the measure Wednesday night, expressing fears that their members might be penalized under the law while doing their volunteer service.
“This organization buries them, gives them military honors,” Allen Bauman said of group’s funerals for veterans. “Nobody else does that. Don’t shoot the messenger.”
Julian de Mediana, a Walnut resident and Vietnam veteran, said he felt the law would keep veterans from wearing their uniforms.
“You’re going to stymie the proud veterans who like to wear their uniforms,” he said. “There are so many veterans in this community who are so proud, especially those coming from Iraq and Afghanistan.”
City Attorney Michael Montgomery, also a veteran, said that civilian groups designated by the U.S. Secretary of Defense would not be affected by the ordinance. The city ordinance mirrors the federal code, which clearly lists who can wear military uniforms, he said. The city code gives the Sheriff’s Department something to enforce on the local level, he said.
“It in no way infringes on anyone’s rights,” he said. “If you can legally wear the uniform, then go ahead and wear it. If you can’t legally wear the uniform, then don’t wear it in Walnut.”
The Mad Man
8:33 am on Thursday, January 26, 2012
When you talk to a veteran who has been there, you know if he/she is telling the truth. Veterans are smart people and can tell if you are bs-ing or not.
The Mad Man
8:41 am on Thursday, January 26, 2012
How and who is going to enforce this ordinance? Are you going to check every veteran wearing a uniform or medals? How do you handle veteran day parades?
UCMJ clearly defines when and where you can wear your uniform. Does wearing the uniform really define who is and who is not a veteran?
West Coast Watcher
9:25 pm on Sunday, January 29, 2012
This is a sad day in America. Mr. Tom King obviously had an underlying reason for supporting and pushing this issue through. It is the California State Militia of which he is a member. He also mentioned in the ordinance that active military and the "CSM" are authorized to wear the uniform in Walnut. This as audacious to put the CSM in the same category as our active military. If you eliminate "CSM" in the ordinance, then this ordinance has no teeth because it is just a duplication of Federal Law.
The CSM are state volunteers. They do not wear an active military uniform. They wear a distinctive uniform authorized by the State of California. They wear a big CA on their lapel and not a US. He was even so bold as to name drop the fact that Supervisor Michael Antonovich is a member of the CSM.
Could it be that Mr. King rather than having a "sick feeling" at seeing the alledged "fakes" wearing uniforms and badges they didn't earn, he was trying to project the public from have a "sick feeling" when seeing members of the CSM
wearing ill fitting uniforms and badges they didn't earn? But now they are protected in Walnut!
There is not one veteran group in America that has not had someone put on a ribbon they didn't earn by mistake or on purpose, or wear a uniform incorrectly. Let the Federal Government deal with that issue.
At least there were two clear headed thinking individuals who understood the issue and voted no.
Michael West
8:08 am on Monday, January 30, 2012
I think it's time for change on the Walnut City Council- I hope you get out and vote on April 10, 2012.
Michael West
11:13 am on Tuesday, January 31, 2012
According to Zillow, Walnut property values have been declining since 2008: http://www.zillow.com/local-info/CA-Walnut-home-value/r_34636/
Where on earth did the statement that they are increasing come from?
Michael West
1:58 pm on Monday, February 6, 2012
I find it disingenuous when government calls a TAX a “fee” or “assessment”- if it’s on your property tax bill, I call it a tax. Walnut wants to charge Three Oaks residents a $4,988.80 “assessment,” PER YEAR, for their LOSMD area. I would have put “No new taxes, assessments, or fees” on my campaign signs but it wouldn’t fit! http://www.ci.walnut.ca.us/upload/Item09_011112.pdf
Brigid
2:17 pm on Friday, March 16, 2012
Reg. military uniforms Ms. Tragarz "abstains" from the vote. This past Wed. Ms. Su on another issue did the same thing. Get real people. Don't be such cowards. Vote yes or no. That is what you were elected to do.